facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast blog search brokercheck brokercheck

Target Date Fund Analysis

The Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) regulations created fiduciary protections for plan sponsors and enabled them to create better retirement solutions for their participants.

Some plan sponsors thought it also relieved them of the responsibility for monitoring the QDIA product that they selected. The DOL has made clear that “The final regulation does not absolve fiduciaries of the duty to prudently select and monitor QDIAs.”1

In order for your organization to meet your fiduciary obligations to prudently select and monitor your target date QDIA funds, a thorough analysis is necessary because of the underlying complexity of these products and their unique structure relative to the traditional “core” investment options that defined contribution plan sponsors are used to evaluate.

Target date funds are designed to be a single investment option that is appropriate from the time an investor enters the workforce and starts saving for retirement all the way up to, and in some cases, through their retirement. Because of the expected longevity of these investment vehicles and the expectation that plan sponsors do not want to shift target date fund series every few years to chase better products, it is important that the investment management firm be fully committed to their product. Commitment to the target date fund series shows up in the form of dedicated investment professionals focusing on managing the target date funds, fully developed research supporting their construction methodology, and a minimum level of asset scale within the products.

At the most basic level your organization needs to evaluate the following characteristics of your target date fund series:

  • Investment Management Firm Capabilities (Firm Stability, People, Process)
  • Equity Glide Path
  • Asset Class Selection
  • Investment Management Implementation
  • Investment Costs

Ultimately, your evaluation of the investment management firm comes down to the people, processes, philosophy and performance. Supporting the five P’s should be sound investment and operational processes that allow the investment professionals to meet the funds’ investment objectives while ensuring compliance with all applicable rules and regulations. Our process combines the five P’s and the QDIA regulations into a plan sponsor questionnaire and a demographic analysis of the participant population for an approach that is tailored to the organization with the final result being an investment opportunity that fits the plan demographics, complies with the DOL guidelines, and most importantly positions plan participants for successful outcomes.

1 Employee Benefits Security Administration “Regulation Relating to Qualified Investment Alternatives in Participant-Directed Individual Account Plans”, April 2008


Copyright 2015 Bedellium, Inc. All rights reserved.



MCF Institutional uses research from industry tools creating a TDAnalyzer Process:


Bdellium’s QDIA Blue Book

An optimization of suitability based on Committee opinion (qualitative)

Risklab’s Glidepath Optimizer

An optimization of suitability based on plan demographics (quantitative)

Where the Blue Book optimizes a committee’s opinion, Risklab’s Glidepath Optimizer optimizes a plan’s demographics and risk tolerance as exhibited by the Participant’s investment behaviors.