facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
%POST_TITLE% Thumbnail

Retirement Expectations vs. Reality: What Workers May be Getting Wrong

The 2026 Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) and Greenwald Research Retirement Confidence Survey (RCS) finds a widening gap between what workers expect retirement to look like and what retirees actually experience, particularly around retirement timing and working for pay. For plan sponsors and advisors, the findings offer a timely reminder of why proactive and realistic education matters.

The Retirement Timing Gap

One of the survey’s most consequential findings is the disconnect between when workers plan to retire and when retirees actually did. 

  • Surveyed workers report a median expected retirement age of 65. Retirees, by contrast, report they actually retired at a median age of 62.
  • Nearly 4 in 10 workers (39%) expect to retire at age 70 or older, or never to retire at all. Among retirees, only 10% report that was their actual experience.
  • 29% of retirees say they retired before age 60. Only 12% of workers expect to do the same.
  • 46% of retirees say they left the workforce earlier than planned, often due to a health issue, disability, or unexpected employer changes.

This pattern has been consistent across decades of RCS data: workers routinely overestimate how long they will work and underestimate how early life circumstances may force the issue. For participants, this gap represents a real financial risk. Fewer working years means fewer years of contributions, less time for compounding, and a longer drawdown period.

Working in Retirement

Workers are also far more optimistic about working for pay after they retire than retirees’ actual experiences suggest they should be. Three in four workers (74%) say they plan to work for pay during retirement. In practice, only 31% of retirees report having done so.

This has been a recurring finding throughout the RCS’s history. Workers continue to factor part-time income into their retirement income strategy without factoring for the potential impacts of health issues, caregiving demands, labor market conditions, or other factors.

How Sponsors and Advisors Can Make a Difference

The 2026 RCS reinforces some realities plan sponsors and advisors can help address, for example:

  • “Save as if you’ll retire earlier than you think.” A savings strategy built around an assumed retirement age of 65 or 67 leaves little margin for an earlier exit.
  • “Don’t count on working in retirement.” Part-time retirement income can be a meaningful supplement, but it’s not a reliable backstop. Participants who plan for it as a financial necessity may be taking on more risk than they realize.

The gap between expectations and experience is persistent and important. Helping participants understand and close the gap is a tangible way sponsors and advisors can add value. 


Download Article


Return to Participant Insights


Sources: 

https://www.ebri.org/content/2026-retirement-confidence-survey-finds-americans-less-confident-about-retirement-as-worries-grow-over-social-security--medicare-and-rising-costs  

https://www.ebri.org/docs/default-source/rcs/2026-rcs/rcs_26-fs-2.pdf
Material connection - Retirement Plan Advisory Group, https://www.rpag.com/


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION   

MCF Advisors, LLC ("MCF") is an SEC registered investment adviser. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. More information about the adviser can also be found by visiting: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/summary/130372. The above commentary is  for informational purposes only. Information prepared from third-party sources is believed to be reliable though its accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. MCF may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. Please remember that past performance is not indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by MCF), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog/newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog/newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MCF. To the extent that a reader has any  questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her situation, he /she is encouraged to consult with  the professional adviser of his/her choosing. MCF is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of this content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of MCF's current written disclosure statement and customer relationship summary ("Form CRS") discussing our advisory services and fees continues to remain available upon request. The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. If you are an MCF client, please remember to contact MCF in writing if there are any changes in your personal /financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.